Reliability of assessments used to measure what students
learn isn't reliable and therefore very limited. There are many factors including, a student
having testing anxiety, and language or cultural factors. Using this as a means to scale students doesn't provide a full profile of the entire student.
It doesn't measure what children have actually learned nor does it bring
into account the progress a student has made throughout the school year. Real-world challenges and knowing how to preserve,
work with others cooperatively and apply other skills cannot be measured from a
test.
There is so much pressure not only on the students taking the test, but also the teachers. With the change in teacher accountability, more pressure is placed on teachers to work miracles or they job security is at risk.
Despite are practices to differentiate instruction to students we still asses them the same way as their non-disabled peers. As a special educator, I work with students with a variety of disabilities and learning styles, yet when it comes to standardized testing they are still expected to take. This has always been somewhat of a challenge for me to comprehend.
“Finland--which is one of the
top performers on international tests--has gone in the opposite direction”. They don’t use standardized tests as often as
the U.S. Students there take more low
states tests rather than high-stakes tests.
Students aren’t over-tested.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/16/standardized-testing-a-fo_n_2145623.html